Buy on Amazon
£108.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2612 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 266 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
