Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 308 days older than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-8130U - 325 vs 308 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
325
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |