Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 915 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 272 vs 268 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
