Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-7100T - 245 vs 238 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
69.61946350592639%
Multi-Core
2260
83.82789317507418%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |