Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 974 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-560 - 297 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 6 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
297
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |