Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4146 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-560 - 170 vs 154 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
27.635683094198377%
Multi-Core
932
34.56973293768546%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
