Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 653 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-390M - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 8 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |