Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 2319 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-380M - 229 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
229
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£275
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £275 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |