Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4354 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 74% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-380M - 747 vs 430 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
747
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£358.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £358.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |