Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1155 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 1700X - 138 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700X - £264.0 vs £275.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 1700X - £1.91 vs £2.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 20 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £275 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£264
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £264 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |