Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i3-370M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 3602 days newer than Core i3-370M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 52% better in War Thunder than Core i3-370M - 189 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-370M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-370M doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£94.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £94.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-370M | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |