Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-370M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2389 days newer than Core i3-370M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-370M - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-370M doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-370M
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-370M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
