Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930 - 165 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - £39.99 vs £144.97
- Up to 69% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10300 - £0.27 vs £0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
30%
Price, £
£144.97
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £144.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
147
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |