Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £13.99 vs £126.8
- Up to 87% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11400F - £0.11 vs £0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3220 - 154 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
80%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£13.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £13.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
13%
Price, £
£126.8
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £126.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |