Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1802 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £16.26 vs £409.61
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3220 - 239 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
44.71890971039183%
Multi-Core
1085
15.553325688073393%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |