Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1431 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Core i3-2367M - 694 vs 666 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-2367M
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
