Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 216 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - £49.95 vs £133.97
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-13100 - £0.25 vs £0.62 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £133.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |