Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2871 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8350 - 257 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
