Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7400T - 109 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
