Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i3-10110U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 573 days newer than Core i3-10110U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10110U - 799 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 16 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
799
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |