Buy on Amazon
£77.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - £77.03 vs £175.54
- Up to 40% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-11600KF - £0.39 vs £0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-10105F - 271 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
196
72%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£77.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7358 minutes ago
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
60%
Price, £
£175.54
43%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for £175.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
