Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3161 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G530 - 185 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
