Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1100 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 33% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G530 - 84 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 20 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
361
40.74492099322799%
Multi-Core
634
11.788769059129788%
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
