Buy on Amazon
£59.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 976 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £59.75 vs £150.72
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 93% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G4900 - 54 vs 28 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 644 minutes ago
Intel Core I7-6700K Processor (4 GHz, 8 M Cache, LGA1151)
Buy for £150.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
41.62162162162162%
Multi-Core
1051
21.46211966510108%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
