Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 2165 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G4900 - 76 vs 72 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
76
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£97.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £97.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |