Buy on Amazon
£29.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 462 vs 459 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - £25.15 vs £29.99
- Up to 17% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3930 - £0.05 vs £0.06 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz 2M Cache Dual-Core CPU Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 Tray
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
