Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1144 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G3900 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
199
98.51485148514851%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
39.045698924731184%
Multi-Core
992
10.424548129466164%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |