Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £49.95 vs £328.88
- Up to 73% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-9700F - £0.51 vs £1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 76% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1840 - 171 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
97
56%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.92/FPS
26%
Price, £
£328.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |