Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 899 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G1840 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
190
99.47643979057592%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
83.33333333333334%
Multi-Core
854
28.841607565011824%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |