Buy on Amazon
£100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2928 days newer than Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3930K - 163 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G Processor with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (2C/4T, 3.5 GHz Base Clock)
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
