Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1589 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 42% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - £49.95 vs £86.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - £0.55 vs £0.88 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 98 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
91
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |