Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 548 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G550 - 448 vs 436 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
