Buy on Amazon
£215
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 218 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1620 - 169 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel 3rd Generation Core i7-3770K CPU (4 x 3.50GHz, Ivy Bridge, Socket 1155, 8Mb L3 Cache, Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0)
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
57.85007072135785%
Multi-Core
723
29.283110571081412%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
