Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3025 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 287 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £250.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.250105440742303%
Multi-Core
723
6.603945926196565%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |