Buy on Amazon
£359.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 482 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
482
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£359.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-14700F Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for £359.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 20 |
| 2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
