Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - £5.56 vs £494.75
- Up to 98% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i7-10700 - £0.05 vs £3.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 37% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
73.125%
Value, £/FPS
£0.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5336 minutes ago
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.09/FPS
1.6181229773462786%
Price, £
£494.75
1%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £494.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.944971537001898%
Multi-Core
739
10.542082738944366%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
