Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3692 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £5.56 vs £579.98
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 35% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G1610 - 261 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76178 minutes ago
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
13.719806763285025%
Multi-Core
739
3.384784500526725%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |