Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 98 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
