Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2500 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 11% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron B830 - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
