Buy on Amazon
£241.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2860 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 13% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron B820 - 501 vs 444 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
501
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£241.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for £241.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
