Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3180 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron B820 - 145 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |