Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2948 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron B820 - 135 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |