Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2880 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron B815 - 155 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |