Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron B815 vs Core i5-10400F

Celeron B815 vs Core i5-10400F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-10400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for £101.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 99 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-10400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-10400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for £101.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 99 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3042 days newer than Celeron B815.

Advantages of Intel Celeron B815

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F

  • Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron B815 - 132 vs 115 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron B815 Logo
Celeron B815

Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012


FPS

115

87%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

132

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.77/FPS

100%

Price, £

£101.31

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i5-10400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for £101.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 99 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron B815 Logo
Celeron B815

Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron B815 Logo
Celeron B815

Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012


Single-Core

240

16%

Multi-Core

424

7%

Intel Core i5-10400F Logo
Core i5-10400F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1438

100%

Multi-Core

5751

100%

Intel Celeron B815 Logo

Intel Celeron B815

vs
Intel Core i5-10400F Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F

Jan 1st, 2012Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
CeleronCollectionCore i5
Sandy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket G2 (988B)SocketIntel Socket 1200
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
12
1.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.9 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.3 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
29.0x
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge)
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron B815 or Core i5-10400F

A Plague Tale: Requiem, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.