Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2430 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 847 - 180 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
