Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1302 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4160T - 268 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
