Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1177 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 17 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 847 - 167 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |