Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 492 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 5% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 847 - 204 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
