Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 90% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron 3965U - 173 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-13700KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
