Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 3965U - 194 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 24 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£197
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |